![]() |
||
|
|
||
![]() |
||
| DECEMBER 2005 | ||
|
Hi Bob, I was hoping you might give me a little advice, as an aspiring writer of comics. When working as an editor, what did you look for from a writer or pitch? Was it the high concept, the hook, a strong beginning/middle/end, or some other factors that made you choose a particular writer or storyline? Thanks for the time, Chris
Murrin
Chris, Primarily, when reading or listening to a pitch by a writer, the thing I looked for was (A) if the writer understood the character and (B) if his concept broadened the scope of the character as a result of his storyline. The thing that turned me off the most was situation-driven stories that whose conflict had no lasting consequences to the character. A lot of guys would pitch stuff like: "X-O fights Ax--but in the Taj Mahal! X-O has to stop Ax from damaging this glorious wonder of the world." Well--that's a dilemma...not a conflict and, although it might sadden him, it would be no skin off X-O's nose if the Taj Mahal was destroyed as a consequence of their battle. I recall that the Spider-Man Graphic Novel "Gilded Cage" that I pitched to Marvel back in the eighties (with art by Paul Smith and Barry Windsor Smith) was ultimately rejected (even after half of it had been penciled) because the editor felt that the character of Peter Parker would have been changed too drastically by the resolution of the conflict I presented (in the story, Parker had an affair with the wife of a Mafia Don). So--that door can swing both ways. So be careful. Mostly, I looked for character-driven stories, tales that exposed little-seen or brand-new aspects of the character. Internal conflicts seem to manifest themselves outwardly in the course of a story as a natural consequence. I hope my response to your question helped. Best wishes,
Dear
Bob, It
would make no sense Iron Man would look like a tank or jet airplane. Rodney Dube' I
appreciated your comments on Iron Man. Good to know I'm not alone in
my philosophy. I couldn't agree with you more.
Hey
Bob, Gary Sella
You're
a pal.
Ah
tragedy! With
the publication of Part 2 of the excellent Metallix #7, we reach (I
think?) the end of any new Future Comics material for
now. Thank you Bob (and Dave) for taking the time this year
to give us Future Comics fans just a little bit more! The insight
into where the various series were going makes it all the more unfortunate
that things had to come to an end. As I mentioned in my first letter
earlier this year, Future Comics brought me back to comic books
after a nearly 20 year absence. It was a great brand and I hope to
see it return someday soon. Thanks, Tim
Thomas
Hey Tim, Here's a big surprise for you. That wasn't the end of the unpublished Future Comics material. This month, I'm presenting Deathmask #5 --which concludes our first story arc for that series and ends with a startling revelation about a couple the characters. Check out the link for it on this month's features page.
Hey
Bob,
|
Heath, Why are comics written so badly today? While a lot of us spent most of our careers working at perfecting our craft—those values are not held in such high regard by the current publishers who place little emphasis on the esthetics. At
times, I can't help but feel that the
art of storytelling being compromised or disposed of all together. I personally feel it would be better to go down fighting than compromise the fundamentals of good storytelling. That’s why I have little interest in working in mainstream comics these days. In my opinion, the comic companies have thrown out “the baby with the bathwater.” That, combined with the knowledge that today's characters tend to be written to behave in an almost immoral manner. Comics are a unique medium that combines the written word with the visual concept. Comics are the modern mythology that we, as a society, template our fears and dreams upon. Comics
are universal power fantasy we all dream of—to have the ability to soar
above our problems-- or pummel them into dust. Characters without moral
values cloud that magic and sense of wonder. It's
unfortunate but comics are now being written by former hardcore fans for
the current crop of fans. Even so, I have thirty years of comics
experience behind me but I generally can’t read most of the new stuff.
With rare exceptions, most of today’s mainstream comics are…simply
dreadful. Accessibility
to a general audience is something that has to change in order for the
comics industry, and the monthly periodical, to succeed in the long
term. What the industry needs to do is to create comics that would
be easily accessible to the general public, defying the convoluted and
trendy storytelling that makes today’s products confusing.
Hello
Mr. Bob Layton, Being
an old-time comic fan from (West) Berlin, Germany (for example,
beginning at the age of 14 (1972) I changed most of my
money into US dollars and went to the local US army PX to buy my
weekly dose of fresh US Comics at the Stars and Stripes shop - it simply
worked because this was the only part of the PX where they did not
ask for an ID... worked until the terrorists came, but this is another
story. I just stumbled upon your press conference info concerning the end
of Future Comics and from there to your home and archive pages. I
had bought all published issues from FUTURE comics at the FUTURE comics
web shop in 2003 and was quite sad to see another really promising concept
end much to quick. After reading the press conference info I finally
understand why this had happened. Despite
the sad end of Future Comics, being able to read the next issues of
Deathmask, Freemind and Metallix is like a little dream come true-- thanks
to you! Sadly,
none of the 22 pages of the never published Peacekeeper #1 are
loading (the links from the March to May 2005 archives pages seem
not to work anymore). It was already very interesting to read about
the concept and imagine what this series would have been, although it
would naturally be much better if you please could be so kind and make the
22 pages of the first issue of Peacekeeper available again! Thank
you very much in advance!!! And
one question: Would
it not have been a possibility to continue all 4 Future Comics series
through Image or another publisher? Please excuse if this question may
seem too naive, but concerning comic industry politics, I'm just an
outsider, just a lifelong comic fan still hoping... My
best wishes for you, your family and work, Volker
Schramm
Volker, We
recently have a server crash that forced us to recreate the entire
boblayton.com site. Week by week, were working to get all the links
back up and running. Please
be patient while we fix the problem. We should have the Peacekeeper
#1 pages back up soon. Currently,
I'm working with an independent publisher to bring some of the Future
material back in print. I'll be sure to post any progress towards
that end on my site. Thanks
so much for writing me.
Mr.
Layton, (Also a HUGE Ivar fan)
I don't have a copy of that cover, so you'd have to contact him.
Bob, Could
you add your thoughts or plans for this solicited series-- TIMEWALKER:
Fall of the Timeshapers by Bob Layton? I’m not sure exactly
what this one was supposed to be about, but I have a sneaking suspicion it
would have revealed the origin of the Chaos Effect. Thanks, John
Helmer
John, To
be perfectly honest, I can't remember the entire plot. What I do
remember is that it had to do with the great disasters throughout history
and the fact that they were manufactured by a group of
necromancer/engineers who gained power from the massive death energy of
the event. I've been looking for the document for months now but I
can't seem to locate it in my files. However, I KNOW it wasn't about the Chaos Effect. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
|
You’ve publicly stated
that your DOCTOR TOMORROW (September 1997-March 1998) maxi-series
for Acclaim-Valiant was a low point in your career. I couldn¹t disagree
more. In fact, I¹d consider the 11-issue epic a high water mark for you;
perhaps even a masterpiece. The series combines an intricate
time-travel/superhero romp through American history from 1942 to the
present day (1998), often satirically exploring politics & popular
culture (which immediately brought to mind THE BAD EGGS) and war. But what
makes the series even more exemplary is that the story is split into
specific decades, decades which highlight the career of a master comics
artist/creator through each issue¹s artwork mimicry of that specific
creator¹s art style, as a tribute and dedication. Brilliant, clever, and
refreshing: #1, Jack Kirby; #2, Will Eisner; #3, Joe Kubert; #4, Wally
Wood; #5, Alex Toth; #6, Dick Giordano (who penciled the issue);
#7, Neal Adams (this issue¹s cover includes a graphic of Joe Namath --
coincidence?); #8, Gil Kane (who supplied the cover artwork);
#9, John Byrne; #10, Frank Miller; and, #11, the founders of Image Comics.
1.Mike, the original idea actually came from a conversation I had with Fabian Nicieza while walking to a lunch appointment. The deal with my creating Dr. Tomorrow was part of the settlement of my lawsuit with Acclaim for ‘obstruction of duties’. In order to look like ‘one, big, happy family’, Acclaim’s lawyers insisted that I stay on at the company for one year as a writer—in order to give the public impression that the settlement was amiable. Anyway--Fabian
suggested that I do something that was sweeping in scope, encompassing the
entire timeline of the V2 universe and that had a definitive ending.
After that meeting, I went home and created Dr. Tomorrow.
My
fascination with Welles comes from his obvious genius and his being
ostracized from Hollywood for not 'playing along'. Something
I had a lot of sympathy for at that particular time in my career.
COVER ROUGH FOR D.T. #6
2. Actually, I had absolutely nothing to do with the creation of the Teutonic Knight. He was a character that had previously appeared in one of the other V2 books. Fabian simply asked me to include him in the saga for the sake of continuity.
COVER ROUGH FOR D.T. #11
4. I had very little to do with the selection of the artists on Dr. Tomorrow--although that wasn't the deal going in. Early on, the editorial powers went back on their commitment to select the artists from the list that I submitted for the series. (the biggest disappointment was Gil Kane--who I was going to ink on that particular issue of D.T. but they refused to pay him his regular page rate.) However, I was very pleased with the work of a few of the fledgling artists assigned to the series--like Kevin Kobasic (emulating Alex Toth in issue #5).
Wally Wood 50's Sci-fi garb. Have a great holiday yourself, Mike! See you in thirty.
|
|
If you wish to write Bob, please send all correspondence to:
P.O.BOX 2776,VALRICO, FL 33595 or e-mail him at
|