All e-mails sent to Bob may be published on this Letters Page unless withholding is specifically requested.

 

 

Dear Mr. Layton:       

As a longtime DC comics fan, I am currently working on a project (which I hope to turn into a website) that will, when completed, provide a full database for every costumed super-villain in the DC universe.   

One of the things I would like to provide (if at all possible) is insights from the writers who created these villains as to what makes these bad guys tick...any aspects of their origins that have not made it into stories yet for one reason or another, and psychological make-up. 

Obviously, this will not be possible for many of the villains created during the Golden Age, as many of the writers and creators from that era are no longer with us.  But I would like to provide such things for those villains whose creators are still alive.  It's not a mandatory part of the project, but I think it would be great to have.

I realize that you are very busy with your current writing projects, but would it be possible for you to spare some time as I work on this so that I could ask a question or two regarding some of your own villain creations for DC?  I promise not to rush you (I have no deadlines on this) or to push you in any way.  Virtually any information you can provide along the way would be absolutely wonderful! 

And, if you feel that you simply can't spare the time, that's okay too.  I completely understand.  But hey, nothing ventured, nothing gained, right? 

(1) I recall from the L.A.W. story that on his way to becoming Avatar, Tiger (former Judomaster sidekick) had to track down the legendary weapons of the Hindu mythological figure Parashrama.  One was an ax belonging to Shiva, another was an all-seeing eye that originated with someone called Andakhar (I think that was the name; did Agamotto ever sue for copyright infringement?) And the third was the serum of immortality from Soma.  Anyway, I was thinking...if those weapons were considered myths by most Hindus, or at the very least long-hidden religious artifacts, then just how did Tiger manage to track them down?  Wasn't that a pretty colossal undertaking for him, given that his resources were a tad on the meager side?  Did he have help?  And if so, who helped him...and how did he get them to cooperate with him?

(2) I also had a question or two regarding his motives.  I understand that the Soma serum was at least partially to blame for his insanity (though it sounds like he had a head start in that regard, if he was able to convince himself that Judomaster resented him) but what were his plans for after he succeeded in his goals?  Did he assume that once he'd essentially caused all war to stop that everyone would simply accept his benign dictatorship? (Assuming that the people of the world really thought he was all that benign, that is.) Or did he plan to spend the rest of his eternal life as a watchdog for humanity, ensuring that they would never try to wage war again?

Thank you for your time, 

David Peattie

Las Vegas, NV

 

 

Dear David,

A few words about The L.A.W. before I answer your questions:

It was extremely nostalgic to reconnect with the Charlton characters after my years of fan association with them as publisher of the Charlton Bullseye.

However, I feel that the entire project was a big mistake and was doomed from square one.  Originally, I had proposed it as an Elseworld series that explored the time gap that began when the characters' series ended at Charlton and the time they first appeared in the DC Universe (about ten years). It's a shame too, because it was a much better story that the one that appeared in The L.A.W.. 

However, the powers-that-be convinced Dick Giordano (penciler/co-plotter) and me that it would sell best if we created a storyline that tied into the regular DC Universe.  In order to do that, The Charlton Project (as it was originally called) had to be seriously retooled.

 

 

                                         

 

 

 

Subsequently, it started getting edited by committee, with each editorial department insisting we "Do this" or "Don't do that".

As a result, the content became diluted to the point that I no longer recognized it as the story I had created.  At DC, a creator has to deal with an extraordinary amount of bureaucracy and red tape.

Unfortunately, it began to simply beat the enthusiasm out of me and Dickie.

We were told, at the beginning of the project, that we were going to get some big promotions for the series but it never materialized.

Without any promotion or crossover push, the books didn't pull in the numbers we had hoped for.

It's too bad it wound up the way it did.  We had big plans for those characters down the road in the proposed regular series.

Now-- to your questions:

 

(1) Of course Tiger had help. As I stated in the comic (issue#4), it was the original ancient text that he uncovered that led him to the other Hindu relics.  I believe I showed him with lackeys as he explored the various ancient sites. I also insinuated that Tiger killed them to keep the relics existence secret.

What I wanted to do with him was to show how driven and obsessed he had become in order to step out of Judomaster’s shadow.  Keep in mind that Tiger learned from example.  After the war, when Tiger was denied entry to the country he risked his life to defend, Judomaster dragged him around Southeast Asia for almost a decade in his obsession to find the legendary city of Nanda Parbat.

 

(2) That is the nature of megalomania and insanity.  I don’t believe that any would-be conqueror actually thinks out the big picture.  It’s all about ‘getting there’.  Look at Iraq.

Thanks for dropping me a line!

 

 

Hi Mr. Layton,

Just visiting your site and wanted to drop a note about how much I enjoy reading the letters section and seeing all the concept art and commission pages. When reading the letters section I have come to the conclusion that you truly are a class act.

It would have been great to see you in Toronto along with three of my favorite artists (Sears, Smith, and Grummett). Not such a fan of Bart’ work on Warlord but his work on the Justice League Europe will remain a favorite of mine--always.

Just a quick question about an artist I always liked that I never hear about these days, Pat Broderick. I know he worked with you during the Future Comics venture, and I wondered if you still kept in touch? I sure would love to see him come back and do something in the realm of comics again. Man, I would be broke if a publisher was putting out a group of comics with Layton, Grummett, Sears, Smith, and Broderick doing art duties. That would be a dream come true!

Thanks for your time Bob, and all the best in the future.

Best regards,

Chris Ellis

Vancouver B.C.

 

 

 

 

 

UNPUBLISHED COVER TO FUTURE COMICS' MICRONAUTS #1

 

 

Dear Chris,

I have no idea where Pat Broderick is today…and apparently--no one else does either. 

He has literally dropped off the face of the earth.

Allow me to explain:

While Pat was working at Future, we were approached by Micronauts license holder Ken Abrams about creating new comic series with Broderick as the artist.

Dick Giordano, David Michelinie and I started Future Comics with the idea of creating new intellectual properties, not managing other people’s characters.

My interest was more motivated by doing Broderick a service as a fellow artist. I kept thinking how I would feel if Marvel offered David and me the rights to Iron Man. This was the series Pat was best known for and I bent over backwards to try to make it work for him. But, unfortunately, it was a sentimental decision and not motivated by anything resembling business logic.

So, to make a long story short—the principles of the company debated the offer, crunched the numbers based on Image’s current existing version and, ultimately, made the decision to pass on the project.

Unfortunately, Pat leaked the news of the potential project on the Internet prematurely. As a result, the Micronauts deal became a huge public embarrassment for Future Comics (and probably for Devil’s Due, as well—who were still publishing the title at that time.).  As a result, I wound-up having to apologize to Mr. Abrams profusely.

However, in hindsight, passing on the Micronauts project was the right thing to do.
After the Micronauts deal fell through, Pat quit and I never heard from him again. 

Nor, it seems, has anyone else.

 

 

Hey Bob,

I’ve got a question that’s been driving me batty for a few years.

Why is it every single page of Valiant art I see for sale has NO LETTERS on the pages, BUT the outline of a word balloon is present?  What happened to all the letters? Did someone scrape them all off before given back to the artists?

Please solve this mystery for me.

 

Larry Clay

 

 

Larry Ol' Pal,

It was because of Jim Shooter.

He was a classic procrastinator. Jim was late on every single issue he ever wrote at Valiant.  I mean--he was the worst at making deadlines of anyone I've ever worked with in over 30 years of being in comics.

I offer simple proof: Those stupid blank balloons you mentioned.  One needs only to look at any Valiant art page, see the pasted-up balloons and conclude that there must have been a reason for lettering the pages that way.

There was.

The writing was always late.

Late…late…incredibly late..! 

We (Valiant's Production Department) pasted-up the lettering from overlays because the scripts were always the last thing to be completed.

The humorous side of this was that the guys in the production department (who were not dyed-in-wool comic guys) continued the practice of pasting-up the balloons for quite a while after Shooter’s departure from the company.

One day, about a year after Jim left, I was walking through Knob Row and noticed that the production guys were pasting up balloons on a book I KNEW wasn’t late.

Because no one ever told them that paste-ups were anything but the norm, the practice continued.

Also, because the Valiant coloring was painted onto watercolor board with Doc Martin dyes, an individual black plate was needed to insure that the lettering didn't get separated in the printing process, because it would create registration problems.  So much over the lettering continued to be done on overlays although the balloons were lettered directly onto the art.

Does that answer your question, Larry?

 

 

Bob,
I asked John Taddeo contact you about your involvement in a charity project that I am organizing in support of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.  Art Nichols was to be involved in this, as well.  Would you happen to have his contact information ?  Email or phone number would be great.  I really need to get rolling on this.
This project is for a fund raiser that I run every year on the valiantfans.com website/message board.  Last year, we raised over $2,000 that was donated to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and used for cure research.  Don Perlin and yourself also did a pen/ink rendition of X-O Manowar and Bloodshot for the CF fund raiser as well and that piece was incredible... as always.  It brought in a $350 donation.
We have a website for our CF fund raising efforts which is officially sponsored through the CF Foundation.  We have put up a photo of our daughter Alyssa who has CF on the website and you are directly involved... please go to our website to see just how.  If this is something that you do not care for, please let me know and I will correct it.

 

 

I hope that the comic medium will be around for years to come but with the way things are going, I wonder if they will be around in the next ten or so years. 

I am 39 years old and still reading...and here's to 39 more years of comics.
Thanks for your time, your support and the great things you have done and continue to do for comics.

Respectfully,
Chris Scott

 

 

Dear Chris,

It must be "Missing Cartoonists Month" here at Bob Layton.Com! 

First---Pat Broderick...and now--Art Nichols!

I want you, and all the readers out there, to know that I will ALWAYS make my time available for a charitable cause. I was proud to donate my services to you last season and I'm prepared to roll up my sleeves once again. When you're ready, let me know what you require from me and I'll get to work--pronto!

I have absolutely no idea how to contact Mr. Nichols.  Sorry, but perhaps someone reading this might.  That's why I decided to publish your e-mail this month. 

C'mon, gang--help this brother out!

I'd like to urge all of my readers to do what they can to aid in this worthy cause. Buy an autographed book, make a private donation or just spread the word.  Anything you can do will be appreciated by me, Chris, Alyssa and all those afflicted with this terrible malady.

Thanks,

                                                                                            

 

 

 

1.‘The Camelot Trilogy,’ as I call it, featuring ol’ Shellhead and Doctor Doom in IRON MAN, Vol. 1, #¹s 149-150, Part 1, and #¹s 250-251, Part 2, is an unfinished work. In Part 1, Iron Man and Doom time-travel back to the days of King Arthur, while in Part 2 they journey to Camelot of the future. David Michelinie once commented that Part 3, if it ever were to be written, the overall story would conclude in the present day.
How did you and David come to use King Arthur in an Iron Man story arc, and which reference materials did you use for inspiration (in the past, you mentioned the works of Howard Pyle as a general source for your fascination with knights in armor). Michelinie mentioned that the film A CONNECTICUT YANKEE IN KING ARTHUR¹S COURT, starring Bing Crosby, was an influence to him. (I still think Bing should¹ve teamed up with his long-time silver-screen partner Bob Hope in that one!)
Did you and David ever outline Part 3? If so, were there any plans for a new Iron Man armor in the mix?

 

 

 

 

Mike, David and I went so far as to actually plot the bloody thing!  The story took place in present day (instead of the past or future) and brought the entire Arthurian storyline to a logical conclusion. We submitted a detailed outline of the third Camelot saga in 2002—but, unfortunately, Marvel was less than interested in pursuing it as a possible mini-series.   In spite of the clamor from hordes of Iron Man fans to allow David and I to do the occasional special or mini-series, Tom Brevoort seems to have something against the possibility of that ever happening. I do you think he believes that the material his office is currently producing is superior to anything David and I could ever accomplish? 

Gosh--I hope not!

As far as a new armor—I’m not saying.  Who knows…? I may want to post the third Camelot plot here in the future and I wouldn't want to spoil anything.

 

 

 

 

 



 2. WHAT IF?, Vol. 1, #33 played with the notion of Iron Man being permanently trapped in Ye Olde Days of Camelot, while Doom managed to return to modern times. You supplied the cover and story inks for that particular issue. Had you and David ever discussed putting Tony Stark in a similar predicament during the action in IRON MAN #’s 149-150?
George Perez produced a wonderful illustration based on this entrapment notion -- after all, Doom had lied to IM while the two jury-rigged components of their armors to construct a time machine -- for a set of Marvel trading cards back in 1995.

 

 

              

 

 

2. No—we had no plans for anything like that.  Tony is a modern guy and belongs exactly where he’s at.  I inked that issue of ‘What If’ as a favor to my pal, Uncle Don Perlin.  That’s the long and short of it!

3. You penciled and inked IRON MAN #¹s 249-250 (#250, by the way was double-sized, as was #150), whereas you inked John Romita Jr.’s pencils in #’s 149-150. Was JRJR ever considered for the penciling gig on 249-250, or was the labor of love too great for you not to produce all the artwork? Your rendition of Doc Doom, I must say, is one of The Best ever.

 

 

 

3. No—I was the regular Iron Man penciller at the time that #250 was produced. JRJR was busy elsewhere at that time (although I would have welcomed his contribution in a heartbeat!). Unfortunately, that particular issue created some very bad blood between me and the editor Howard Mackie. Howard, fearing that I wouldn’t be able to make the tight deadline, took several pages of my pencils (which were rough layouts—the way I work when I’m inking myself) and passed them out in to the Bullpen to ink. He didn’t bother to inform me that he was doing that, nor did he give me an option to double my efforts or recruit someone more competent to assist.  The end results were disastrous—with a bunch of very amateur-looking pages mixed in with my work. After that, my relationship with Mackie was tense at best.  However, I did press on with the plans to continue the series with JRJR when his schedule opened up. 

But that—is another story.



4. Was there any consideration for a Future Doc Doom vs. the Iron Man of 2093 cover illustration for #250 as homage to the classic Doom vs. IM cover image on issue #150?

 

 

4.Nope...but you’ve just given me a great idea for a commission piece!



5. The character of Merlin in issue #250 was purely delightful --right out of T. H. White¹s take on Arthur’s right-hand man, mentor, and magician: capable, cocky, funny, and proud. White¹s Merlin is also living ‘backwards in time,’ as he ages in reverse -- how appropriate for a time-travel epic! Question: Is your Merlin based at all upon White’s; otherwise, is he simply an amalgam of your and Michelinie’s personalities?
T. H. White’s Arthurian novels THE ONCE AND FUTURE KING and THE BOOK OF MERLYN were the basis for the musical CAMELOT and Disney¹s animated film THE SWORD IN THE STONE.

 

 

 

5  Simply an amalgam.  Actually, there’s a lot of David Michelinie’s personality in his version of Merlin.



 6. On a personal note, until Part 3 of “The Camelot Trilogy” sees print, fans might take note that Peter David has written three superb novels that place a revived King Arthur smack dab in the middle of modern-day American politics. I’m presently reading the third book, FALL OF KNIGHT, which was released in hardcover on June 6. The other two books, KNIGHT LIFE and ONE KNIGHT ONLY, are both in paperback. I mention them because Peter David’s storytelling and humor -- especially humor -- are somewhat similar to yours and David Michelinie’s. Coincidentally, Peter David’s Merlin as described throughout his novels is the spit and image of the Merlin in IRON MAN #250!
Finally, Mike Grell made a time-travel reference to IM #150 in IRON MAN, Vol. 3, #59, prior to Tony¹s heading back to the Middle Ages in a time machine of his own creation. Grell¹s issue #61 -- the third part of his “In Shining Armor” story arc -- concluded with a “sword in the stone” scene, which set the stage for the coming of King Arthur.  
Thanks, Bob.
Mike Kalibabky

 


6. I’ll take that statement as an unabashed plug for Mr. David’s novels, Mike.  See you next month!

 

 

 

 

        IF YOU WISH TO CONTRIBUTE A LETTER OF COMMENT TO THIS PAGE, PLEASE   SEND YOUR  E-MAILS TO: BOB.LAYTON@BOBLAYTON.COM