

All e-mails sent to Bob may be published on this Letters Page unless withholding is specifically requested
|
BOB'S LETTER OF THE MONTH:
Dear Bob, |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dear Tony,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Hi Bob, Thanks and good luck! |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dear Darth,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Hi, Bob. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dear Steven,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Hey
Bob,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Daren, You are absolutely right in terms of your information concerning how the cards are going to be offered.
I stand
corrected and apologize for any confusion.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Hi Bob.
I’m a long-time fan of your
work and just recently discovered your site – can’t wait to spend more
time going through the archives. I’m probably really late chiming in on
my thoughts re: Iron Man: Legacy of Doom, but I only just read it and
wanted to share my thoughts with you on how much I enjoyed the issue.
I loved how the first page
foreshadowed the last page with Iron Man in Mephisto’s presence trapped
in hell. And Tony’s conflicting emotions on feeling sentimental (to the
older armor), and feeling practical with protecting himself from techno
theft was spot on. I’ve always loved this aspect of Tony’s character
where he can be so driven to invent the next bit of cutting edge
technology as if unsatisfied with the level of tech currently in his
possession, and yet like a child with a favorite toy, want to hold on to
what he once had. The struggle of sentimentality and practicality is
played perfectly in that scene. I also loved the nobility of our Knight
in Shining Armor as he’s pretty much certain he’s flying into a Doom
trap, but goes anyway for the sake of any lives in peril. I miss that
from what little I have read of the current Iron Man stories. He seems
a harder man these days. The moments where Iron Man grasps Doom and
speaks disrespectfully to him were amusing. He’s not playing the role
of lackey this time! Question for you: In this story, Doom clearly knows that this was the Iron Man he fought against in Camelot (back in #150). In Issue #250, Doom encountered Iron Man again but observed that he had fought IM’s predecessor since the world was under the impression the original IM was killed during the Armor Wars. In this story, that doesn’t seem to be the case. Tony made no effort in hiding the fact that he and Doom had trouble getting back to the future the first time. And since Doom stated “Vengeance is Mine” at the close of the issue, he knew the truth as well. My question is: What was the thought process between you and David in choosing to develop the story in this way? Did you debate the pros and cons of whether to abide by continuity or write a story outside of continuity that would allow a more interesting tale to be told? Perhaps the fact that many years have passed since those days played into the decision. I’ve always been interested in the choices writers make, especially when it involves continuity and a story that can only exist outside of it. I guess that’s a conflict writers have to struggle with at times when in the business isn’t it? Great job on the story so far.
Robert Hibbard |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dear Robert, As far as your question concerning Doom's threat of "Vengeance is mine," I can't speak for David, but the way I always looked at it was that Doom saw Iron Man as a pawn of Tony Stark's. When he speaks of vengeance, it's related to not just the lackey inside the armor, but to the man he believes to be pulling the strings behind the scenes. Also, although it's not said, it's quite possible that Doom has figured out that Tony Stark is really Iron Man in that the ruse of more than one person in the armor is merely that. Thank you for your kind words. I hope that the rest of the series meets with your approval.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Hi Bob! I was really impressed with the first issue [of Iron Man: Legacy of Doom]! The story was entertaining and had action and great characters. I don't want to see Iron Man melt down his armors, but the fact that you guys addressed Extremis, and that Stark was securing the tech that he doesn't need was a well thought out compliment to the new status quo. Of course, I'm sure other armors will continue to pop up, but I thought there was smart storytelling here that really complimented the amazing art! I have been a fan of Ron Lim since his Silver Surfer days all the way through his Future Comics work. He's doing a great job so far in this mini, too! The layouts are awesome with some really dynamic panel work... it really made the book fun to look at! The colors were really vibrant too and everything had very crisply inked line work. Honestly, the first issue of this book was a colorful, eye candy joy to look at with a really solid start to the story. Seriously the IM:LoD team is battin' a thousand so far! I also wanted to thank you for the amazing cover you contributed to our upcoming 75th issue of our online fanzine, Advanced Iron. To receive a single figure piece of artwork from an industry pro is usually very exciting, but to receive a full cover with such great content and symmetrical layout is thrilling. I know that Chris Frye conveyed our appreciation to you, and it’s very exciting that the two of you have such a good rapport. I’m very appreciative of the fact that you’ve continued to support the zine throughout all of our changes, both in regime and presentation. Thank you for sticking with us!
Sincerely, John B. Comerford |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dear John, I'm glad that you're happy with the cover that the Invincible Ron Man and I came up with for your anniversary issue. It was a blast doing it and I hope your readers enjoy the effort. I appreciate your opinions on the first issue of Legacy of Doom. Apparently, you are not alone in your enthusiastic praise of our first issue. Below are some links to various reviews that were found all over the internet, including several from some high profile places like Ain't It Cool News. Most were positive, but in the interest of fairness, we'll post them all, good or bad.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Bob,
I met you at the New York
Comic Con and you signed my Iron Man: the Iron Manuel, thank you for
that. I also mentioned how I used that book to make a report for a class
I had in High School. You asked that I email you the story so here it
is.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Kurt, Thanks for giving me the credit for helping you on your report, although most of the credit for the Iron Manual has to go to Marvell's science maven, Elliott R. Brown.
If you think the Iron Manual was a cool thing, the latest issue of Popular Science (May 2008) has a great article concerning the technology currently available to create a real-life Iron Man. Again, glad I was able to be some assistance in getting you through school! Just remember that if you ever become a rich and famous physicist!
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Bob, I know you are a big football fan - what do you think about arena football? I am a season ticket holder with the Chicago Rush - and I still cannot believe that we let Matt D’Orazio go to the Philadelphia Soul.
Douglas Oberg |
|||||||||||||||
|
Doug,
Best wishes,
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Hello Mr. Layton,
All the best, |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dear John, I've been waiting a long time for someone to ask me this question. As you stated, it was one of the storylines that David and I left hanging when we moved on to other projects. But now, it can be revealed! The person who killed the original Madame Masque was none other than Tony's girlfriend at the time, Rae LaCoste. She had been manipulating Tony throughout their relationship with the ultimate goal of usurping the leadership of the Maggia for her own. Not only that, but unbeknownst to anyone (except David and me), Rae was also the ex-wife of Ant-Man/Scott Lang. Obviously, things were going to get very complicated once we started unveiling Rae LaCoste's "dirty laundry." It's unfortunate that we never got a chance to continue that particular storyline. Obviously, the permutations would have been very juicy with lots of internal conflicts for everyone involved. So there ya go!
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Bob! I’m sure you probably saw this Iron Man movie review:
I love the mention in the
review regarding how cool the suit is. Hope all's well with you and that
you're busy, busy, busy. We're (Rachel & me) watching the IM movie
tonight! As an FYI: We know Mark Fergus, one of the screenwriters on this. Did you get a chance to meet him or any of the production folks on this project?
Congratulations, again, for
being involved one way or another in a kick ass movie ... only the
latest incarnation of a stellar franchise!
Brian Pittman |
|||||||||||||||
|
Brian,
I flew to
NYC last Tuesday(4/29) for some editorial meetings and Marvel's
screening of the Iron Man movie. Although I missed the Variety review, I
did talk to some Hollywood insiders at the N.Y.C.C. who had already seen
the movie. So, I had some idea of what to expect going into it. My biggest complaint was having Obadiah Stane climb into the Iron Monger suit himself. Throughout the entire film, Stane acts as a "puppet master", manipulating people and events without personally getting his hands dirty. Then, conveniently, he builds the Iron Monger armor and jumps into it himself, without the need of the tedious learning curve we watched Tony go through for the preceding 50 minutes of the movie. Personally, I'm tired of the "good super-hero" vs. his "evil counterpart" Hollywood cliché. Spider-Man 3 suffered from that and it looks like the Hulk movie will be more of the same. No matter what you think of 'Superman Returns', at least Lex Luthor is a brilliant foil for being able to thwart the Man of Steel without the aid of extraordinary super-powers. Overall, the Iron Man movie franchise will be a huge boost for my boy Shellhead and it's going to help move this character into the consciousness of the general public--more towards Superman or Batman status.
To answer
your last question: Although I will be featured prominently on the Iron
Man DVD release in October 2008, I had absolutely no contact with the
producers or any of the cast of the film at any time. Given the
litigious atmosphere that's pervasive around these comic-to-film
adaptations, it doesn't surprise me that the producers are a little shy
about getting former creators involved in the film development.
But, when you see the film, it's obvious that the classic
Michelinie/Layton version of the Tony Stark's character is represented
more than the current Marvel incarnation.
|
If you wish to contribute a letter of comment to this page, please send your e-mails to: bob.layton@boblayton.com